Preprint · arXiv 2026

The Flip Side of RLHF: On-Policy Feedback for Reward Model Self-Supervised Improvement

SAVE — Self-supervised reward model improvement via Value-Anchored On-policy feedback

Xiaobo Wang, Tong Wu, Min Tang, Jiaqi Li, Qi Liu, Zilong Zheng

University of Science and Technology of China · Beijing Institute for General Artificial Intelligence

SAVE framework overview
Overview of SAVE. The policy generates on-policy responses; a value head provides a prompt-specific anchor to grade them into positive / negative feedback (ambiguous samples are filtered out), and the reward model is improved with a contrastive objective before the next round of policy optimization.

Abstract

Building strong reward models (RMs) for language model alignment is bottlenecked by the cost and difficulty of acquiring diverse and reliable preference data from human annotation or judge models. It is dramatically worse as the policy evolves beyond the static RM training. Therefore, we propose SAVE (Self-supervised reward model improvement via Value-Anchored On-policy feedback), a framework that grades on-policy responses as feedback by using the value function for on-policy RM training. SAVE naturally converts the reward-graded on-policy responses into supervision with a prompt-specific value head as an adaptive anchor. It computes RM advantages and filters ambiguous samples to update the RM via a contrastive objective. The effectiveness of SAVE for enhancing RM training is strongly validated through rigorous empirical evaluation across six diverse benchmarks. It achieves outperforming results across all datasets while maintaining consistent improvements across three RL algorithms (GRPO, RLOO, GSPO) and different policy backbones.

How SAVE works

STEP 1

On-policy generation

The current policy rolls out a group of candidate responses for each prompt.

STEP 2

Adaptive feedback filtering

A shared backbone produces a response reward and a prompt value; the RM advantage separates positive / negative samples and filters ambiguous ones.

STEP 3

Self-supervised RM update

A contrastive objective pushes positives above and negatives below the value anchor, while the value head is fit to the unbiased value estimate.

STEP 4

Policy optimization

The improved RM scores fresh candidates and a standard RL algorithm (RLOO, GRPO, GSPO) updates the policy.

BibTeX

@article{wang2026flip,
  title   = {The Flip Side of RLHF: On-Policy Feedback for Reward Model Self-Supervised Improvement},
  author  = {Wang, Xiaobo and Wu, Tong and Tang, Min and Li, Jiaqi and Liu, Qi and Zheng, Zilong},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.30888},
  year    = {2026}
}